Paramedic Immunity: Coit v. Nappi 1

Kopec Law Firm

The Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog features Maryland appellate opinions in medical malpractice cases. This post addresses the legal standard for claims against Paramedics and EMTs and also the paramedic immunity that results for failing to meet the standard. Specifically, I will discuss the reported opinion in the case of Coit v. Nappi, 248 Md. App. 44 (2020). 

Factual Background

The 21 year old patient died of a cardiac arrest following an asthma attack. Afterward, his parents and estate filed a wrongful death claim in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. The defendants were a paramedic and EMT. They responded to the 911 call for the patient. An additional defendant was their employer, Baltimore County. The circuit court subsequently granted the defense motion for summary judgment, and the plaintiffs filed an appeal. (Op. at 1). 

Paramedic Immunity
Paramedic Immunity

The paramedic & EMT argued that they were to receive paramedic immunity under CJP 5-603 (the Good Samaritan Act) and CJP 5-604 (Fire & Rescue Companies Act). In addition, Baltimore County argued it was to receive governmental immunity under CJP 5-301. The defendants further claimed contributory negligence by the patient and insufficient evidence of negligence. (Id. at 4).

The plaintiffs then responded that there was sufficient evidence of gross negligence and the defendants’ policies and customs kept them from receiving immunity. (Id.).

Appellate Court on Paramedic Immunity

The Court of Special Appeals adopted the opinion of the circuit court. (Id. at 2). The circuit court noted the Maryland definition of gross negligence is:

[G]ross negligence is an intentional failure to perform a manifest duty in reckless disregard of the consequences as affecting the life or property of another and also implies a thoughtless disregard of the consequences without the exertion of any effort to avoid them. (Id. at 6).

The plaintiffs asserted that the defendants were willful and grossly negligent in their pre-arrival and post-arrival and were not entitled to paramedic immunity. In the pre-arrival, the plaintiffs focused on the delayed response time, incorrect information to dispatch, and lack of urgency on arrival. The post-arrival allegations center on the assessment and treatment. (Id. at 8).

Evidence

The courts found that the evidence did not establish willful or grossly negligent pre-arrival conduct. The ambulance arrived less than seven minutes after the call for service. The responders’ failure to run from the ambulance to the patient was not negligent; it was specifically for the safety of the responders. (Id. at 9-10).

The courts also found that the evidence did not establish willful or grossly negligent conduct post-arrival, and paramedic immunity applied. The responders promptly assessed and treated the patient:

“They checked for a pulse, observed agonal respirations, placed an oxygen mask on Mr. Coit, prepared an intravenous line and began administering fluids, began transcutaneous cardiac pacing to address Mr. Coit’s heart rate, administered Narcan, and administered Atropine. Treatment and assessment of Mr. Coit’s condition continued after Mr. Coit was removed from the house and taken to the medic unit for transport to Northwest Hospital. He was intubated with an endotracheal intubation tube. Further assessment resulted in noting the absence of mechanical capture with transcutaneous pacing and agonal electrical rate without a pulse. Emergency medical service providers began administering CPR and administered Epinephrine during transport to Northwest Hospital. Upon arrival at Northwest Hospital, Paramedic Nappi reported to emergency department personnel regarding what treatment had been provided and the status of Mr. Coit’s condition.” (Id. at 10).

The plaintiffs claimed Narcan not needed because there was no indication that the patient was experiencing an opioid overdose. However, Narcan causes no harm. (Id. at 11). 

As a result, the responders were to receive paramedic immunity based on the Good Samaritan Act and the Fire & Rescue Companies Act and to judgment as a matter of law (Id.).

Commentary by the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer on Paramedic Immunity

Past Maryland cases demonstrate how difficult it is to meet the willful conduct and gross negligence standard in cases against ambulance crews. You can read more generally about this in this Blog’s post on the case of Stracke v. Butler.

This Coit case does not come close to meeting the evidentiary standard to avoid paramedic immunity. The plaintiffs’ case seems to be based mostly on their perception and belief that the responders were not hurrying in their response and treatment of the patient. The case also included a complaint of unnecessary Narcan that caused no harm. Consequently, the defense’s summary judgment was predictable.

In part 2 of the post, I will address the issue of causation that the courts discussed.

Mark Kopec is a top-rated Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer. Contact us at 800-604-0704 to speak directly with Attorney Kopec in a free consultation. The Kopec Law Firm is in Baltimore and helps clients throughout Maryland and Washington, D.C. Thank you for reading the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog.

What Our Clients Say About Us

At the Kopec Law Firm, we are grateful that satisfied clients express their appreciation!

Mark is a knowledgeable and empathetic lawyer who speaks directly and concisely to evaluate your problem. He doesn't use attorney jargon that confuses people, rather he talks clearly. Although he couldn't help me with my situation, the consultation I had was productive because he answered my questions and gave me some clarity.

Shahnaz in Ellicott City

Dear Mark, I just wanted to express my gratitude for your dedication to my case. As you know, it has been a long and upsetting process for me, which would have been a great deal longer had it not been for the hours you put in helping me with this emotional roller coaster. Thank you again.

Shannon T. in Anne Arundel County

Dear Mark, thank you so much for your help and kindness. You provided the guidance and assistance we needed to obtain some understanding in loss of our child. We will never forget the professional and personal service provided. If anyone is in need of legal representation, I will certainly send them your way. God bless.

Kim C. in Cecil County

I wanted to say thank you for spending time with me regarding my questions about legal issues. Mere words cannot really express my gratitude. You seem to truly care about people.

Client in Baltimore City

Dear Mr. Mark, I’m truly grateful to have had you work on my son’s case. You were up front at all times and were on key every step of the way. I will always recommend your firm. Thank you so much for helping my son. P.S. Every time my son sees you on TV, he says “Mom, that’s my lawyer, Mr. Mark.” 🙂 Thank you again. You did an excellent job on the...

K.N. in Baltimore City

Dear Mark, we want to thank you for all the hard work and time your firm put in our case. You took the time to listen to us and research our case. You were honest and up front regarding the case. You responded to questions and concerns quickly. We would highly recommend your firm and services to anyone who is in need of legal representation. We...

Rebecca T. in Prince George’s County

Super Awesome team and staff! Worked with them for a case they handled for my grandchild about 10yrs ago! Would definitely use them again! I recommend them to everyone I know. Could never thank them enough! Very thorough and knowledgeable! Always kept us in the loop throughout the entire process!!!!

Letha C. in Prince George’s County

Mark explained everything in detail and brought clarity to all of my concerns.

Doris in Edgwater

I am very happy and thankful for your help. You responded very quickly. I am very happy to recommend you.

Linda in Chevy Chase
  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Talk to a Lawyer
  3. 3 No Fee Unless You Win
Fill out the contact form or call us at 800-604-0704 to schedule your consultation.

Send Us a Message