Medical article excluded in malpractice case,
date was the end of the period of treatment and could not inform the treatment.
Mark Kopec Now
Medical article excluded in malpractice case,
date was the end of the period of treatment and could not inform the treatment.
Expert testimony on experimental drug did not point
to other evidence supporting the conclusion beyond the expert’s own testimony.
In medical malpractice involving post-endoscopy monitoring, an anesthesiologist expert was a related specialty to a gastroenterologist.
Continue reading ›CQE & report was sufficient in identifying the defendant through its agents and stated the standard of care and how it was not met.
Continue reading ›General Surgeon and internal medicine were related specialties in a CQE for the purpose of examining for decubitus ulcers.
Continue reading ›Expert testimony is required to establish the material risks of a medical procedure in an informed consent medical malpractice claim.
Continue reading ›A medical malpractice expert using inference does not have to testify that the injury would not have happened in the absence of negligence.
Continue reading ›Medical Malpractice CQE. Report was valid. It provided some details as to the standard of care and how the defendant failed to meet it.
Continue reading ›A plaintiff who voluntarily dismisses a case for no report attached to CQE cannot use the savings provision in CJP 5-119 to re-file.
Continue reading ›Late expert designation was allowed where the plaintiff failed to initially disclose all prior medical providers.
Continue reading ›