Failure to identify meeting witness was discovery violation. “Occurrence” in interrogatory was broadly construed.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
Failure to identify meeting witness was discovery violation. “Occurrence” in interrogatory was broadly construed.
Continue reading ›A prenuptial fee-sharing agreement is enforceable if it does not restrict practice and is a reasonable attempt to forecast quantum meruit.
Continue reading ›Where a notice of appeal is filed more than 30 days after judgment, the scope of appeal is only from denial of the post-trial motion.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a registered nurse can opine on causation in a Certificate of Qualified Expert (Nurse CQE) in a decubitus ulcer case.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, medical malpractice experts who changed their testimony from deposition were subject to Daubert exclusion.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a plaintiff is entitled to have entry of judgment, and post judgment interest start, nunc pro tunc to the date of verdict.
Continue reading ›Mall owner and management company had separate duties and were each joint tortfeasors under settlement agreement.
Continue reading ›The Maryland statute of limitations savings clause in CJP 3-2A-04(b)(4)(iv) applies only to the 25% rule, and not all of section (b).
Continue reading ›Summary judgment was inappropriate on inquiry notice for the statute of limitations for an injury that was not healing properly.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, the circuit court must answer fully a jury note to prevent the possibility that the jury would evaluate improper considerations.
Continue reading ›