For the Maryland medical malpractice statute of limitations, injury timing is when damages first arise, not when all the damages have arisen.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
For the Maryland medical malpractice statute of limitations, injury timing is when damages first arise, not when all the damages have arisen.
Continue reading ›A plaintiff cannot use a portion of defense expert testimony to generate a genuine dispute of material fact and ignore other portions.
Continue reading ›Affidavits opposing summary judgment may be stricken if they contradict prior sworn testimony of the affiant, making them irreconcilable.
Continue reading ›Plaintiff received a 90-day extension to file a CQE and failed to file a compliant one. Dismissal without prejudice was correct.
Continue reading ›A delayed-response policy was insufficient to establish liability, and the county was entitled to immunity.
Continue reading ›Plaintiffs in wrongful death case against a paramedic and EMT were required to have a medical expert to satisfy causation.
Continue reading ›Evidence against paramedic and EMT was insufficient to establish willful conduct or gross negligence, resulting in paramedic immunity.
Continue reading ›Proximate cause in wrongful death does not require the diagnosis delay to cause the chance of survival to go from above 50% to below 50%.
Continue reading ›If no legal obligation, there must be proof of intention by statement or action by the deceased to continue providing household services.
Continue reading ›Infection introduced during surgery was last element of medical malpractice that arose in Virginia for choice of law on a damage cap.
Continue reading ›