Causation Expert: Dackman v. Fisher
Maryland medical malpractice lawyers likely need a causation expert to prove that the doctor’s failure to meet professional standards caused the injuries. This requirement is called causation, and usually, a doctor has to testify in support of it.
On October 30, 2023, the Appellate Court of Maryland discussed medical expert causation testimony. It is an unreported opinion in Dackman v. Fisher. Although it involved a lead paint poisoning case, the holding applies to causation testimony in medical malpractice cases. I will discuss the case and then provide commentary for Maryland medical malpractice lawyers.
Dackman Facts
The plaintiff alleged exposure to flaking lead paint as an infant in his family’s rental house. (Op. at 1). As a result, he claimed he suffered brain damage and other injuries. (Id. at 4).
The plaintiff obtained a medical doctor as a causation expert witness. He had experience treating children who suffered from lead poisoning and was familiar with medical publications on the topic. (Id.)
The defendants were the landlords and owners of the house. They specifically argued that the Court should have excluded the plaintiff doctor’s causation expert opinion under the Daubert standard. Specifically, the defendants argued that the doctor had failed to make a differential diagnosis. Furthermore, he did not determine if the plaintiff’s condition was caused by lead paint or by ADHD and mental illness. (Id. at 12). The defendants also argued that the ADHD and mental illness presence made it impossible to connect the problems to lead paint. (Id. at 12-13).
The Court examined “whether a sufficient factual basis exists to support the expert testimony” under Maryland Rule 5-702. The defense then objected to the methodology that the plaintiff’s expert used. It opposed the conclusion that the plaintiff had suffered a brain injury as a result of exposure to lead. (Id. at 20-21).
Assessing the Causation Expert
The Court concluded the plaintiff’s expert properly conducted a differential diagnosis. The plaintiff had a deficit in auditory attention, poor visual-motor integration, and poor working memory. The expert found that these made it likely that lead was the cause. (Id. at 22-23). The doctor then ruled out various other exogenous and endogenous factors. (Id. at 23).
The defendant contended that the plaintiff expert’s differential diagnosis was unreliable. Specifically, it disregarded the specific alternative causes of ADHD and mental illness. (Id. at 23). The Court noted, however, that ADHD and mental illness are not causes of injuries. They are diagnostic labels assigned to behavior that satisfies specific criteria. (Id.) Accordingly, the Court found that the plaintiff’s expert had met the standard. He showed that lead was, more likely than not, a “substantial factor” in causing the harm. (Id. at 27).
Commentary By the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer
Application to Medical Malpractice Cases – Causation Expert
Maryland medical malpractice lawyers need expert doctor testimony. This testimony usually includes an opinion that the defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff’s injury. The Dackman case is an excellent reminder to the lawyer to be proactive. The lawyer should support the cause of the damage. The lawyer should also anticipate what the defendant will likely argue as an alternative cause of the plaintiff’s injury. Your causation expert may be able to explain why the defendant’s alternative explanations do not defeat the plaintiff’s claim. Alternatively, it can be good to retain an expert in another medical area.
Other Cases
- Freeland v. Clark Construction Group, LLC: On March 6, 2024, the Appellate Court of Maryland issued an unreported opinion. Plaintiff in slip and fall case did not challenge circuit court’s finding that he needed an expert and did not explain his failure to comply with the circuit court’s order compelling discovery. Circuit Court did not abuse its discretion if declining to exercise its revisory power.
- Chase v. Kennedy Krieger Children’s Hospital, Inc.: On April 5, 2023, the Appellate Court of Maryland issued an unreported opinion. Plaintiff claimed injury from hitting head on a mounted cabinet but had suffered similar injuries in three recent unrelated accidents. Plaintiff then failed to timely designate a medical expert on causation. Court upheld summary judgment for defense.
Mark Kopec is a top-rated Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer. Contact us at 800-604-0704 to speak directly with Attorney Kopec in a free consultation. The Kopec Law Firm is in Baltimore and helps clients throughout Maryland and Washington, D.C. Thank you for reading the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog.