Plaintiffs’ Revisory motion for discovery sanction in medical malpractice case did not state a procedural irregularity.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
Plaintiffs’ Revisory motion for discovery sanction in medical malpractice case did not state a procedural irregularity.
Continue reading ›Plaintiff met good cause for amending complaint after deadline when he promptly sought leave after receiving the information.
Continue reading ›Court did not err in giving modified Allen charge and limiting deliberations to one hour at the end of the last day of trial.
Continue reading ›It was not error to give general negligence jury instructions before giving medical malpractice jury instruction. There also was no prejudice.
Continue reading ›One Satisfaction Rule barred plaintiff from pursuing a medical malpractice case for damages she sought in a car accident case.
Continue reading ›In Maryland medical malpractice, a verdict sheet question on nonparty malpractice must be supported by expert testimony.
Continue reading ›Recusal not required for judge for wife who was a recently retired OB/GYN trained at and worked for the defendant hospital 30 years earlier.
Continue reading ›A plaintiff cannot use a portion of defense expert testimony to generate a genuine dispute of material fact and ignore other portions.
Continue reading ›Affidavits opposing summary judgment may be stricken if they contradict prior sworn testimony of the affiant, making them irreconcilable.
Continue reading ›Comment that plaintiff wanted defendant to pay for his choices did not warrant insurance mistrial. Curative instruction was also sufficient.
Continue reading ›