Plaintiff met causation of claim against nurse with general surgeon’s causation testimony. Jury could infer connection.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
Plaintiff met causation of claim against nurse with general surgeon’s causation testimony. Jury could infer connection.
Continue reading ›In Maryland medical malpractice, a defendant raising nonparty malpractice must put on expert testimony to support the defense.
Continue reading ›Fetal heart rate tracings and acidemia together could not avoid expert exclusion under Daubert of birth injury causation.
Continue reading ›Plaintiff received a 90-day extension to file a CQE and failed to file a compliant one. Dismissal without prejudice was correct.
Continue reading ›An inference of negligence is permissible when there is expert testimony that a permanent lingual nerve injury only occurs from negligence.
Continue reading ›Toxicologist exclusion under Daubert was appropriate for analytical chasm between an accepted premise and expert’s unfounded conclusion.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a registered nurse can opine on causation in a Certificate of Qualified Expert (Nurse CQE) in a decubitus ulcer case.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, medical malpractice experts who changed their testimony from deposition were subject to Daubert exclusion.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, an expert doctor is in a “related specialty” when there is overlap and symmetry in treatment with the defendant doctor.
Continue reading ›In MD’s CQE requirements for medical malpractice, the teaching exception to the board certification requirement has no time restriction.
Continue reading ›