Plaintiffs’ experts in birth injury case had sufficient factual basis for their opinions on Betamethasone to defeat a Daubert challenge.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
Plaintiffs’ experts in birth injury case had sufficient factual basis for their opinions on Betamethasone to defeat a Daubert challenge.
Continue reading ›A Daubert hearing focusing on medical studies should involve testimony by a REI expert, not just counsel arguments.
Continue reading ›Plaintiff’s rebuttal expert responded to opinions the defense had not disclosed. These constituted a new matter making rebuttal appropriate.
Continue reading ›A medical malpractice plaintiff must identify individual agents and employees of corporate entities in the CQE.
Continue reading ›Medical malpractice plaintiffs submitted sufficient expert causation testimony to establish that earlier action would have prevented injury.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, the right to an extension to file a CQE is mandatory when the three statutory requirements are met.
Continue reading ›Plaintiffs must identify individual medical provider agents in a CQE even when case is only against corporate defendants.
Continue reading ›Plaintiff met causation of claim against nurse with general surgeon’s causation testimony. Jury could infer connection.
Continue reading ›In Maryland medical malpractice, a defendant raising nonparty malpractice must put on expert testimony to support the defense.
Continue reading ›Fetal heart rate tracings and acidemia together could not avoid expert exclusion under Daubert of birth injury causation.
Continue reading ›