Plaintiff’s rebuttal expert responded to opinions the defense had not disclosed. These constituted a new matter making rebuttal appropriate.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
Plaintiff’s rebuttal expert responded to opinions the defense had not disclosed. These constituted a new matter making rebuttal appropriate.
Continue reading ›It was error to enter judgment after excluding de bene esse depositions. It was not the close of evidence and there was no written motion.
Continue reading ›A private autopsy without notice to the defendants and subsequent cremation of the body did not constitute spoliation of evidence.
Continue reading ›Issues were not preserved for appeal when counsel failed to object to questions, after denial of motion in limine.
Continue reading ›Defense counsel’s comments in closing argument on evidence that was not admitted did not prejudice the plaintiff.
Continue reading ›The trial court did not abuse its discretion in the exclusion of evidence of an email that the defendants produced two days before the trial.
Continue reading ›