Scope of Appeal: Freeland v. Clark

Kopec Law Firm

The Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog is a trusted resource for Maryland appellate cases. It delves into various personal injury areas, including those that intersect with medical malpractice. One such case is Freeland v. Clark Construction Group, LLC, No. 40 (Mar. 6, 2024), where the Appellate Court of Maryland issued an unreported opinion. Specifically, this case involves the scope of appeal. This a common issue of appealing from a denial of a post-trial motion rather than the underlying judgment.

The appellant, a subcontractor, sustained injuries in a utility hole accident. Afterward, the appellant filed a negligence complaint in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. However, he failed to identify any expert witness in his discovery responses. Afterward, the defense filed a motion in limine to exclude any expert witnesses, which the court granted. Subsequently, the defense filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the appellant could not succeed without an expert. The circuit court granted this motion, leading to the appellant’s appeal, and the issue of scope of appeal.

Scope of Appeal Timing

The timing for scope of appeal is as follows. The circuit court entered the dismissal on September 29. On October 26, the appellant filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing that he did not need an expert witness, which the court denied on February 8. On March 7, the appellant then filed a notice of appeal. (Id. at 1-2).

Scope of Appeal

Significantly, the Appellate Court first generally discussed the scope of appeal:

“Following entry of judgment in a trial court, a litigant seeking to revise or modify the order may file one of two post-trial motions: (1) a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Maryland Rule 2-534.; or (2) a motion for the court to exercise its revisory power pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-535. If a motion, however labeled, is filed more than ten days but less than thirty days after the entry of judgment, it will be treated as a motion under Maryland Rule 2-535. Pickett v. Noba, Inc., 114 Md. App. 552, 557 (1997).”

Timing

Then the Appellate Court specifically discussed the timing related to scope of appeal:

“Where the circuit court denies a motion to revise under Rule 2-535 and the party appeals that denial more than thirty days after the entry of the underlying judgment, as occurred here, the propriety of the underlying judgment is not before this Court. Id. at 558-59. Rather, the only question before this Court is whether the denial of the motion to have that judgment revised was an abuse of discretion. See Stuples v. Baltimore City Police Dep’t, 119 Md. App. 221, 240 (1998). An abuse of discretion is defined as “discretion manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.” In re Don Mc. 344 Md. 194, 201 (1996).”

The Appellate Court observed that the appellant did not argue that the circuit court had abused its discretion and upheld the circuit court’s refusal to exercise its revisory powers. (Op. at 3).

Commentary by the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer

The Appellate Court’s scope of review was limited to abuse of discretion because the appellant only appealed from the denial of the motion to revise the judgment, and not the underlying judgment. This crucial detail, however, which may have been unintentional, underscores the importance of timing in the filing of post-trial motions and notices of appeal.

Therefore, it is imperative to navigate post-trial motion practice and the filing of a notice of appeal with utmost care to ensure the intended scope of appeal. The appellate rules, a complex but necessary guide, are in Title 8 of the Maryland Rules. You can also find a comprehensive discussion of these rules on the appeal page of the litigation process section of this website.

Additional Case on Scope of Appeal:

Derr v. Jakoby (2023): The plaintiff in a car accident case filed a motion for a new trial within ten days of the judgment. After the court denied it, he filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment, which also was denied. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal more than 30 days after the denial of the motion for a new trial (but within 30 days of the denial of the motion to alter or amend judgment).

As a result, the underlying judgment was not within the scope of the appeal. Further, the Appellate Court applied the deferential abuse of discretion standard and upheld the trial court.

Mark Kopec is a top-rated Baltimore medical malpractice lawyer. Contact us at 800-604-0704 to speak directly with Attorney Kopec in a free consultation. The Kopec Law Firm is in Baltimore and helps clients throughout Maryland and Washington, D.C. Thank you for reading the Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyer Blog.

What Our Clients Say About Us

At the Kopec Law Firm, we are grateful that satisfied clients express their appreciation!

Mark is a knowledgeable and empathetic lawyer who speaks directly and concisely to evaluate your problem. He doesn't use attorney jargon that confuses people, rather he talks clearly. Although he couldn't help me with my situation, the consultation I had was productive because he answered my questions and gave me some clarity.

Shahnaz in Ellicott City

Dear Mark, I just wanted to express my gratitude for your dedication to my case. As you know, it has been a long and upsetting process for me, which would have been a great deal longer had it not been for the hours you put in helping me with this emotional roller coaster. Thank you again.

Shannon T. in Anne Arundel County

Dear Mark, thank you so much for your help and kindness. You provided the guidance and assistance we needed to obtain some understanding in loss of our child. We will never forget the professional and personal service provided. If anyone is in need of legal representation, I will certainly send them your way. God bless.

Kim C. in Cecil County

I wanted to say thank you for spending time with me regarding my questions about legal issues. Mere words cannot really express my gratitude. You seem to truly care about people.

Client in Baltimore City

Dear Mr. Mark, I’m truly grateful to have had you work on my son’s case. You were up front at all times and were on key every step of the way. I will always recommend your firm. Thank you so much for helping my son. P.S. Every time my son sees you on TV, he says “Mom, that’s my lawyer, Mr. Mark.” 🙂 Thank you again. You did an excellent job on the...

K.N. in Baltimore City

Dear Mark, we want to thank you for all the hard work and time your firm put in our case. You took the time to listen to us and research our case. You were honest and up front regarding the case. You responded to questions and concerns quickly. We would highly recommend your firm and services to anyone who is in need of legal representation. We...

Rebecca T. in Prince George’s County

Super Awesome team and staff! Worked with them for a case they handled for my grandchild about 10yrs ago! Would definitely use them again! I recommend them to everyone I know. Could never thank them enough! Very thorough and knowledgeable! Always kept us in the loop throughout the entire process!!!!

Letha C. in Prince George’s County

Mark explained everything in detail and brought clarity to all of my concerns.

Doris in Edgwater

I am very happy and thankful for your help. You responded very quickly. I am very happy to recommend you.

Linda in Chevy Chase
  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Talk to a Lawyer
  3. 3 No Fee Unless You Win
Fill out the contact form or call us at 800-604-0704 to schedule your consultation.

Send Us a Message