Medical malpractice plaintiffs submitted sufficient expert causation testimony to establish that earlier action would have prevented injury.
Continue reading ›Mark Kopec Now
Medical malpractice plaintiffs submitted sufficient expert causation testimony to establish that earlier action would have prevented injury.
Continue reading ›Plaintiff met causation of claim against nurse with general surgeon’s causation testimony. Jury could infer connection.
Continue reading ›Plaintiffs in wrongful death case against a paramedic and EMT were required to have a medical expert to satisfy causation.
Continue reading ›Proximate cause in wrongful death does not require the diagnosis delay to cause the chance of survival to go from above 50% to below 50%.
Continue reading ›Maryland courts again decline to recognize the loss of chance doctrine in wrongful death claims in medical malpractice cases.
Continue reading ›Intervening and superseding cause instruction applied to doctor’s breach by ordering from a pharmacy that later delivered contaminated drug.
Continue reading ›In a Maryland subsequent negligence situation, the defendant has the burden of production that the second negligence was a superseding cause.
Continue reading ›In Maryland, a causation expert in a medical malpractice case should be prepared to do a differential diagnosis and rule out other causes.
Continue reading ›