Medical article excluded in malpractice case,
date was the end of the period of treatment and could not inform the treatment.
Mark Kopec Now
Medical article excluded in malpractice case,
date was the end of the period of treatment and could not inform the treatment.
Expert testimony on experimental drug did not point
to other evidence supporting the conclusion beyond the expert’s own testimony.
No reopening of discovery in medical malpractice case. Prior counsel declined to do depositions, and plaintiffs had detailed expert reports.
Continue reading ›$10M medical malpractice verdict where excess Pitocin led to prolonged contractions, deprivation of oxygen, brain damage and cerebral palsy.
Continue reading ›No psychiatric immunity for medical malpractice as a matter of law. Patient threatened those near him, which would include his wife.
Continue reading ›$13.75 million medical malpractice verdict for alleged excess anesthesia and failure to timely recognize respiratory failure.
Continue reading ›The COVID immunity statute for medical malpractice does not hinge on whether the healthcare
provider treated a patient for COVID.
$25M medical malpractice verdict for failure to diagnose and treat chest effusion leading to fatal cardiac arrest.
Continue reading ›Trial judge’s disclosure of Mary Carter agreement on last day of trial was too late and required reversal of jury verdict.
Continue reading ›$25M medical malpractice verdict for delay in diagnosing angiosarcoma, including delays in imaging and misreading of biopsy.
Continue reading ›